I frequently am asked questions about the all time great hitter, Ted Williams and Charlie Lau. Williams is thought of as being a pure rotational hitter, while Lau was a pure weight transfer teacher. Both are misconceptions and misrepresenting the swing.

Percentage wise, Ted teaches more rotation but if you look at his old videos and still shots, you clearly see his weight going from back to center which is weight transfer. Lau embraced a pure weight shift philosophy and many of his still shots in his book do show hitters on top of their front leg, however, that isn’t what happened to those same hitters in real game action swings.

If any of you have Ted William’s book, The Science of Hitting, turn to the very last page and you will see a perfect swing. However, look closely. Ted has gone to the center position, with his back heel in the air, and his toe – NOT the ball of his foot – on the ground. This clearly shows you the weight has transferred to the center position therefore, it is not a pure rotational swing. A pure rotational swing that would involve no weight transfer, would consist of the weight spinning on the ball of the back foot. It is clear cut, he is definitely not spinning.

The swing is definitely a combination of both rotation and weight shift however, there are vary-ing degrees of this combination. Speaking in mathematical terms, look at it as a matter of the percent used of each. Some hitters will use a greater percentage of rotation, while others will use a greater percentage of weight shift. Ideally the swing should be 50/50. Fifty percent rota-tional, fifty percent weight transfer. Most great Major League hitters are at 50/50 – Palmeiro, A-Rod, and Giambi – just to name a few.

Results of having a pure rotational approach are that the hitter will be guaranteed to have a less effective, more inconsistent circular hand path. When taking a circular hand path through the zone, the barrel of the bat stays on the contact plane for a very short time. This leads not only to an improper hand path but also to inconsistent contact. In addition to that, these hitters will have a greater likelihood of rolling over the ball with their top hand which in turn leads to more weak ground balls being hit.

Contrast that to a hitter using a strict weight transfer or linear path. Despite the fact that he will stay on the ball longer, he will in fact have more of a chopping type swing. That is why a com-bination of the two is what leads to the most success. The proper hand path will start out linear, or straight to the ball and on the finish or follow through, the swing becomes more circular. In other words, the swing is more linear on the approach to the ball, and more circular on the fol-low through. Remember to keep it simple because this truly isn’t a difficult concept, people make it much harder then what it is.

As you can see, if you are looking for a true ‘Fetchless Tee’, there is only one choice, Swingaway!

Here is what some industry experts had to say about the Swingaway:

“I think the SwingAway is an excellent machine… It makes you comfortable with the pitches you’re going to see.” – Eddie Murray

“There’s not a better machine on the market today …it’s the best hitting tool I’ve ever used…guys around the league will tell you the same thing.’ – Jay Buhner

“After batting practice I go into the cage and use the SwingAway…to warm up. It feels good and you don’t have to chase balls like when you hit off the tee. The SwingAway is going to be in my backyard every year. I think the SwingAway is needed in schools and backyards around the country.” – Vinny Castilla

“The SwingAway is an outstanding training device… It helps our hitters work on contact points…different pitch locations and gives them the ability to take more quality cuts in a shorter period of time. The SwingAway would be a great investment for anyone serious about improving their swing.” – John Rittman, Stanford Softball Coach

Let us help make you a believer too!  Click here for more information on the leading baseball instructional tool.